6-Philosophy-Epistemology-Truth

truth

Statements are true or not {truth, epistemology}. Only propositions, not terms, can have truth. Statements can be factual, consistent, complete, and coherent.

subjects

Truth can be about mental representations, such as beliefs, sentences, and statements, or about propositions, about which statements are instances.

statements

True propositions are analytic or synthetic statements. Analytic propositions are true in themselves. Synthetic propositions are real-world or imaginary-world facts.

statements: meaning

Statement truth depends on statement meaning, not statement words.

statements: time

Statements implicitly include time, and statement truth depends on time.

logic

True knowledge does not lead to false lemmas.

language

Truth is relation between language expression and physical and social world. The physical and social world is independent of speakers. However, language expression depends on speaker concepts and understanding. Word sense and reference change over time, position, and context. Therefore, necessary truths and a priori truths cannot exist.

Cambridge change

Predicates can be true at one time and not true later, though things in predicates have no real changes, because something else changed {Cambridge change}. Cambridge change is necessary for real change.

6-Philosophy-Epistemology-Truth-Characteristics

consistency

Statements can be consistent with all other facts {consistency}.

completeness

Statements can correspond with all facts {completeness}.

coherency

Statements can relate all facts logically {coherency} with no facts left out.

6-Philosophy-Epistemology-Truth-Kinds

a posteriori truth

People can know some truths {a posteriori truth}| only after perceiving them.

a priori truth

Before perceiving, knowing, or experiencing, people can know some logic and mathematics truths {a priori truth}|. A priori statements are independent of experience, are necessary, are universal, or are about general laws that seem self-evident but are not provable.

test

A priori knowledge is untestable. Can people know anything by reasoning alone? Is any statement true in all cases? Perhaps, untrue assumptions underlie a priori statements.

reasoning

Reasoning can proceed from first principles or from self-analysis and introspection. First principles can use false assumptions and/or invalid tautologies. Personal biases can cause self-analysis and introspection to lead to statements true for only one person.

Related Topics in Table of Contents

6-Philosophy-Epistemology

Drawings

Drawings

Contents and Indexes of Topics, Names, and Works

Outline of Knowledge Database Home Page

Contents

Glossary

Topic Index

Name Index

Works Index

Searching

Search Form

Database Information, Disclaimer, Privacy Statement, and Rights

Description of Outline of Knowledge Database

Notation

Disclaimer

Copyright Not Claimed

Privacy Statement

References and Bibliography

Consciousness Bibliography

Technical Information

Date Modified: 2022.0225